We have a friend who is a hard-core investigative journalist. He went to Afghanistan to document CIA's unsavory practice of extraordinary rendition by interviewing tortured detainees. He uncovered race based kills taking place during Hurricane Katrina and triggered a federal Grand Jury investigation. In another Frontline documentary, he brought to light incompetent coroners who wrongly convicted parents of infanticide.
Me, I'm just an enthusiastic tea drinker with a blog trying to find some interesting aged pu-erh for a reasonable price. So I asked my hard-hitting journalist friend what I should do about this vendor who sold me a fake 1998 CNNP 7542. Because I had already opened this cake, I cannot get a refund.
He pointed me towards state anti-fraud laws. He also mentioned "Federal prosecutors could use wire fraud and telecom laws --
essentially using the internet to perpetrate fraud -- to prosecute. " Heavy duty! I actually don't want to prosecute this vendor. I just want him to sell good pu-erh and not mislead clueless buyers with false advertising.
My friend also recommended that I gather more information on my blog. Several people have come forward on
my previous entry as having been fooled by this very cake. Thank you for this public service. Two mentioned they buy samples first to prevent this kind of thing. One commentor said he would never buy from Jim again. I understand his disgust and I'm not sure why Jim would sell a cake that would generate such a negative backlash.
Puerhshop.com is one of the largest North American vendors with 156 pu-erh selections. Admittedly small compared to Yunnan Sourcing's 1000 pu-erh selections, but puerhshop is big for a Western vendor. They press their own American Hao brand cakes and their 904 has gotten a
favorable taste review from Hobbes despite the kerfuffle with the misleading labeling. I ordered the American Hao Chocolate Bar. It's good- they somehow managed to Americanize shu so it tastes more like roast coffee than pu-erh. It's the perfect beginner's shu that I was looking for to convert some of my friends for which the Menghai flavor is too much of a leap. I really want PuerhShop to succeed and create more of a market for pu-erh in the states.
I would consider PuerhShop as being responsive and having good customer service. One of the dianhong packets were torn in transit and they promptly gave me a refund. So when I wrote Jim regarding this delicate matter, he inexplicably forwarded me to a
taobao item which he says is the "same tea cake where I got mine". Even a brief glance at the wrapper(taobao on the left, puerhshop on the right) indicate these cakes are not the same.
The character spacing on Jim's cake is highly unusual and does not match any of the CNNP wrappers I see in books, magazines, or on the web. The wrapper is also unusually thick. But I don't care about the wrapper or authenticity or some other cake in China. Is the cake he sent me old and if not, is it good? This particular beeng I received is young and boring- two strikes. If it was old and bad or young and good, I would not bother complaining so publicly at all.
Think of the delicate ecosystem of the world pu-erh market from tea farmer all the way to the drinker. This web includes countless middle men and middle women you never see. Maybe this cake went through various inflations in price and age. Maybe it changed hands 4 times and gained a few years each time. Abuse of the system exists because the lack of verifiable information. But you have to think, here's a cake with no identifying date, it's supposedly 15+ years old and who knows where it's been. Who can really vouch for an age of a twentieth century sheng except by taste and experience. This is where the premium for a vendor's experience comes in- you pay for the fact they tasted and sorted out the fakes and duds for you.
Despite appearances, I did not buy this cake to do an exposé. I was pathologically driven by curiosity to buy this cake. Why would such a big vendor risk his reputation by selling something so questionable? I intentionally bought a whole cake knowing it was a fake
because I thought I would have need to send out samples to various
parties to confirm this is no 1998. But it was so so beyond the pale of a
doubt that it's
a youngster, I really don't need further confirmation. If I can tell so readily as other buyers did, then Jim must know this cake is no 16 year old. I
also thought the 7542 would be a more interesting fake than just another weak-ass subpar sheng. This 7542 makes my other boring sheng(FTMs et al) look good. To boot, I actually don't think this 7542 is even a legitimate CNNP.
The statue on the left is the infamous Getty kuoroi. Forgeries abound in the art world and even prestigious institutions like the Getty get taken for a ride. There was enough controversy that they had to revise the label- "
Greek, about 530 B.C., or modern forgery". I guess if Jim had put in a caveat, I would not have even been interested. Would people buy a cake of dubious provenance?
At a certain point when buying aged cakes, it's based on vendor trust. Should I support a vendor who knowingly puts cakes of questionable origin for sale? Do I have to be weary of any other cake that I might buy from them. This isn't some shady Chinese backstore without a return policy. This is the United States dang it with consumer protection laws! I won't be looking for justice through Judge Judy although the thought of making her inspect different cakes and do an aged sheng tasting does fuel a brief comic fantasy. For now I think I'll pass and begin my evaluation through other Asian vendors. It really is too bad as I like the spirit of their operation and love 2 day shipping. Sigh.
