Majority of you who guessed the age of this sheng put it in the 2003-2007 range but the
mysterious Squaretooth knew something that others didn't. Squaretooth
put a direct arrow on 1998 which is the vendor advertised age for this
CNNP 7542. Even if this cake was reverse-aging in the Gobi since 1998, I would put this cake no older than 2006. My house is extra dry storage so my cakes which have been with me since 2005 provide a reasonable comparison. I went through my entire collection and found a twin from 2006. Most of my 2006 cakes look much much darker than the 7542 but this little Jingmai Ancient Forest was a close match.
Actually in better light, even the Jingmai is a tad more aged than this 7542 but I don't have any sheng past 2006 to compare since my sheng buying stopped 7 years ago. This little mini-beeng should age relatively faster than my full size 2006 beengs but it is unexpectedly the least aged. This confirms my suspicion that silver tips will slow down aging. My 2003 Feng Hua Xue Yue Xiaguans which also has a generous inclusion of buds look younger than some of my non-budded 2005 Xiaguans which share that world famous Xiaguan iron compression which also slows down aging. Xiaguan leaves are compressed so tight even a North Korean agent would not be able to hide in it.
This tea tastes pleasant but is nothing special. Boring CNNP's from mid decade are hardly news to anyone. It's gets a bit sweetish- not surprising when you see a good smattering of furry silver tips. Would I buy this tea after tasting it for $68? No I wouldn't. There are definitely more interesting newer wild teas in this price range.
Why pay tuition of $68 on a cake that I already knew was a fake? I bought a full cake so I could share it with others and have an overwhelming consensus that this is definitively not a 1998. I'm doing a full vendor evaluation and have bought a wide range from budget tea to the most expensive offering. I still like this vendor despite this cake clearly not delivering. Why am I so nice all of the sudden? What happened to my ball-busting style that I used to good effect on Verdant Tea? I could have posted an incendiary "Vendor X is Selling Fakes". I'll have to explain why I'm holding off in another post after I finish the entire order.
In the world of pu-erh, your biggest risk is overpaying whether it's a fantastic cake, mediocre cake or a regretful sub-par cake. It's best not to have overpaid but it's better to have overpaid for a fantastic cake than anything less. Quality of tea is a separate issue from authenticity. The risk for fakes increases when you start paying for older or more expensive teas. You could have paid big bucks for an authentic premium cake or an authentic aged cake and it could turn out to be just "meh". If the tea doesn't deliver perceived value, does it matter that it was real if you purchased the cake strictly for your drinking pleasure?
Vendors can often be fooled by their middlemen and I have to think more about how to approach this case. Fakes don't have to end unhappily. I have another fake I got on ebay long ago- the 2002 Menghai Wild Tree which is one of the most interesting shengs in my collection and cost me ~$20. If this 7542 had been a little more lively and interesting, I would let all of this pass. But it is not dear reader so keep tuned or let me know what you think I should do.
Actually in better light, even the Jingmai is a tad more aged than this 7542 but I don't have any sheng past 2006 to compare since my sheng buying stopped 7 years ago. This little mini-beeng should age relatively faster than my full size 2006 beengs but it is unexpectedly the least aged. This confirms my suspicion that silver tips will slow down aging. My 2003 Feng Hua Xue Yue Xiaguans which also has a generous inclusion of buds look younger than some of my non-budded 2005 Xiaguans which share that world famous Xiaguan iron compression which also slows down aging. Xiaguan leaves are compressed so tight even a North Korean agent would not be able to hide in it.
This tea tastes pleasant but is nothing special. Boring CNNP's from mid decade are hardly news to anyone. It's gets a bit sweetish- not surprising when you see a good smattering of furry silver tips. Would I buy this tea after tasting it for $68? No I wouldn't. There are definitely more interesting newer wild teas in this price range.
Why pay tuition of $68 on a cake that I already knew was a fake? I bought a full cake so I could share it with others and have an overwhelming consensus that this is definitively not a 1998. I'm doing a full vendor evaluation and have bought a wide range from budget tea to the most expensive offering. I still like this vendor despite this cake clearly not delivering. Why am I so nice all of the sudden? What happened to my ball-busting style that I used to good effect on Verdant Tea? I could have posted an incendiary "Vendor X is Selling Fakes". I'll have to explain why I'm holding off in another post after I finish the entire order.
In the world of pu-erh, your biggest risk is overpaying whether it's a fantastic cake, mediocre cake or a regretful sub-par cake. It's best not to have overpaid but it's better to have overpaid for a fantastic cake than anything less. Quality of tea is a separate issue from authenticity. The risk for fakes increases when you start paying for older or more expensive teas. You could have paid big bucks for an authentic premium cake or an authentic aged cake and it could turn out to be just "meh". If the tea doesn't deliver perceived value, does it matter that it was real if you purchased the cake strictly for your drinking pleasure?
Vendors can often be fooled by their middlemen and I have to think more about how to approach this case. Fakes don't have to end unhappily. I have another fake I got on ebay long ago- the 2002 Menghai Wild Tree which is one of the most interesting shengs in my collection and cost me ~$20. If this 7542 had been a little more lively and interesting, I would let all of this pass. But it is not dear reader so keep tuned or let me know what you think I should do.